Pros

Airtable is a great solution that lets you build a database-style table for any workflow.

1. Versatile Features: The all-in-one tool has several innovative features, such as:

• A single interface with no code required.
• Several custom views — such as a checklist, kanban board, chart, or timeline;
• Hundreds of templates for different team members and use cases;
• Multiple views and permissions to ensure the safety of your Airtable datum.
• A project management software for better task management and file sharing with role-based access control.

2. Advanced Data Manipulation: Compared to even the best tools on this list, Airtable maintains a competitive edge with powerful data management and analysis.

Cons

1. Limited Permissions: Airtable's basic user roles and permissions might not cover the needs of growing or complex teams.

However, a great way to improve collaboration and create external-facing content with Airtable is use its extensive integration capability.

Sync automatically with a third-party app like Softr to build powerful client portals and custom apps in minutes.

2. Ramp Up Time: Team members new to databases will face a noticeable learning curve, making it less accessible for everyone.

Airtable Pricing

Airtable has three transparent pricing tiers, with a free plan available. Each package offers a variety of features, based on your unique needs.

• Free Plan: Offers unlimited boards for up to five team members.
• Team Plan: $20/user/month that includes 50,000 records (rows) per table, additional views, and more.
• Business Plan: $45/user/month with 125,000 records per base, admin panel, premium integrations and more.

Check out these 10 Airtable competitors:

• Google Sheets
• Notion
• Smartsheet
• Coda
• Baserow
• Tableau
• Grist
• Hive
• ClickUp
• Stackby

Pros

1. Easy-to-Use: What sets Google Sheets apart is its user-friendly approach to data manipulation.

It allows the usage of a wide range of formulas for data manipulation, lookups, and others such as “average,” “countif,” “stdev,” “vlookup,” "match”, “importdata,” or “concatenate.”

You don’t need to know the formulas beforehand, because you can access them on from the “Insert” menu item.

2. Custom Integrations: Both Google Sheets and Airtable integrate with third-party applications, including project management software Zapier, Trello, Slack, and Softr.

Google Sheets also deeply integrates with other Google Workspace tools, like Google Apps Scripts.

Cons

1. Can Be Clunky: If you have a large, complex dataset, you may find Google Sheets to be slow, particularly when loading sheets or applying complex formulas, and so a bad alternative to Airtable for that use case.

Tip: If you want to create a frontend for your Google Sheets data to make it simpler and more secure for your users to interact and edit data in real-time, you can use a no-code app builder like Softr. It integrates seamlessly with both Google Sheets and Airtable.

Google Sheets Pricing

Google Sheets can be considered as a free alternative to Airtable, as it’s a free tool, offered to all Google users. In contrast, Airtable offers a free tier with basic features and limits on records and attachments.

• Free Plan: Available to all Google Users.
• Plus Plan: $10/user/month for more storage and functionality.
• Pro Plan: $20/user/month for additional storage and support.

Google Sheets vs. Airtable

Similar to Airtable, Google Sheets has robust support through documentation, forums, and tutorials. Google Workspace customers can also access 24/7 support via phone, email, and chat.

Both tools allow you to customize the cells by size, text color, or cell color, among others and change their data format. Unlike Airtable, Google Sheets doesn’t allow you to create different types of fields such as multiple select or attachment fields directly within cells.

Airtable and Google Sheets provide a historical list of changes, so you can control who revised what in your dataset. In addition, both tools allow you to choose who can view or edit your database.

Though Airtable has an extensive library of templates, Google Sheets can make use of an even bigger amount of user-generated templates due to its larger user base.

When using Airtable, you can access its documentation, contact the company’s support, or reach out to an Airtable expert or agency. On the other hand, when using Google Sheets, you can find more helpful content on the web, compared to that related to Airtable.

In terms of visual design, Google Sheets maintains a functional, no-frills approach, whereas Airtable is more visually appealing with customizable views and the ability to incorporate images directly into cells. Therefore, depending on your taste for visual design, you may prefer Google Sheets as an alternative to Airtable.



Overall, Google Sheets is an adaptable Airtable alternative, useful for numerous applications such as project management and budget tracking, albeit lacking advanced features like complex relational databases and Kanban boards found in Airtable.

Pros

1. Customization Options: The project management and documentation platform is highly customizable, allowing users to handle diverse content types within a single workspace.

Some of these options are available in Airtable, but not all of them, so Notion can be considered an alternative to Airtable that offers more features in this regard.



2. Customer Support: Notion provides robust user support through email assistance, a comprehensive help center, their Academy, and an active user community

Cons

1. Limited Free Plan: While there is a free plan available, users are limited on the number of blocks that they can use in a given workspace, making it difficult to manage complex projects or import datum without an upgrade.

2. Database Limits: While you can easily filter and customize databases, the tool is not as advanced as standard sheets, such as Excel.

3. Template Export: In order to templatize any of your pages, you need to publish and duplicate.

Pricing

Notion provides packages that cater to various user needs, offering flexibility and scalability in its pricing plans.

• Free Plan: Basic functionality.
• Plus Plan: $8/user/month with additional storage, history, and analytics.
• Business Plan: $15/user/month for more users, increased storage and file uploads, days in page history and guests.

This allows users to select the plan that aligns best with their specific requirements, ensuring they have the necessary tools and capabilities for their projects.

Airtable vs. Notion

Compared to Airtable, Notion provides a visually-driven approach to databases rather than a spreadsheet-like format.

Therefore, Notion is an ideal Airtable alternative for users seeking a flexible, visual database, while those preferring a traditional, grid-based database might lean towards Airtable.

The time required to create a workspace in Notion largely depends on the complexity and volume of data involved, with mastering the platform taking anything from a few days to a couple of months.

Notion shows excellent versatility with its block-based system allowing the creation of various apps and workflows.

However, despite Airtable possibly requiring a more substantial time investment to fully comprehend its myriad features, it stands as the ideal tool for handling intricate relational databases and executing extensive automation functions.

So, depending on what you may want to build, Notion might or might not be a viable alternative to Airtable for you.

While Notion integrates well with popular applications, Airtable offers a broader ecosystem of integrations, so you might want to weigh this aspect when choosing which alternative to Airtable you will pick.

Pros

1. User-Friendly Interface: Smartsheet reports closely resemble traditional spreadsheet, making it intuitive for those familiar with formats like Excel.

This similarity provides an easy transition for users, with a mild learning curve that requires little to no coding knowledge.

2. Accessible: Compared to Airtable, which has a more database-oriented, grid-like interface, Smartsheet might feel more accessible to users accustomed to conventional spreadsheet tools.

So, if you’re looking for an alternative to Airtable that is more user-friendly, you might want to consider Smartsheet.

Cons

1. Slow: The time it takes to create a database with Smartsheet depends on the data complexity, but it will range from a few days to over a month.

2. Limited Views: While you can create interactive dashboards, they might be limited compared to Airtable.

If this is a particular use case that you’re interested in, Smartsheet won’t be a satisfying alternative to Airtable for you.

Pricing

Smartsheet's transparent pricing caters to a wide array of user needs, with options for individuals, teams, and enterprises.

• Free Plan: Limited features.
• Pro Plan: $7/user/year with unlimited viewers.
• Business Plan: $25/user/year with unlimited editors.

Each plan comes with different restrictions, such as the number of sheets and attachment storage limits.

In contrast, Airtable pricing structure focuses more on feature-specific scalability, such as the number of records, attachments, and integrations.

Depending on your budget constraints and your needs, Smartsheet may or may not be a good Airtable alternative for you.

Airtable vs. Smartsheet

While Smartsheet grants users customization options, they are not as extensive as Airtable.

Both platforms prioritize data security, but Airtable provides more granular access controls.

Compared to Airtable, Smartsheet offers an identical range of pre-designed templates, simplifying the development process. It integrates with key applications like Microsoft OneDrive, facilitating file managing and document signing, unlike Airtable which lacks these functions, something to keep an eye on when assessing the competitors to Airtable.



Customer support is available through their portal for paid plans, backed by a community forum and a Help & Learning Center.

The speed and performance of Smartsheet are reliable, albeit not as quick as Airtable, and its visual design is functional, though not as modern-looking as Airtable.

Pros

1. User Friendly: Coda stands out for its ease of use, much like Airtable, sporting a user-friendly interface that encourages quick adoption.

While it has a moderate learning curve like Airtable, it offers a different approach to handling databases and formulas. Prior experience with such concepts can be advantageous in navigating Coda, though it doesn't necessitate coding expertise.

2. Docs and Bases Combined: As an alternative to Airtable's more database-centric layout, Coda blends document and database functionalities into one, providing a unique and versatile experience.

Cons

1. Fewer Templates: Coda offers a limited range of templates, fewer than Airtable, but sufficient to expedite the development process.

2. Limited Free Plan: Integration with apps like Slack, GitHub, and Zoom is only available through Pro and Team Packs.

Airtable's ecosystem of integrations is more expansive, potentially offering greater connectivity for users seeking extensive app compatibility. Therefore, if integrations are important for you, Coda might not be the best Airtable alternative for you.

Pricing

Coda's pricing structure is diverse, covering individual to business needs, just like Airtable.

• Free Plan: For individuals and teams.
• Pro Plan: $10/user/month
• Team Plan: $30/user/month

Each plan gives access to different features, such as collaborative documents, automations, hidden pages, and Pro/Team Packs.

In comparison, Airtable's pricing ranges from a free tier to 'Plus' and 'Pro' plans at $10 and $20 per user/month respectively, focusing on record limits, attachments, and integrations.

While both Coda and Airtable offer pricing tiers catering to various needs, Coda leans more towards feature diversity within each plan, whereas Airtable's structure scales with specific feature requirements.

The decision to opt for either Coda as an alternative to Airtable will largely hinge on the specific requirements and financial considerations of the individual user or team.

Airtable vs. Coda

Creating a workspace in Coda varies in time due to its array of functionalities.

It offers a high level of versatility for creating applications such as project trackers and CRM systems, albeit with a moderate learning curve.

It also presents a fair amount of design freedom and customization of layouts, formulas, and interactive features.

Contrastingly, Airtable, while also feature-rich, is more focused on database and automation capabilities, often requiring a lesser time investment for workspace setup.

So, depending on your use case, you might or might not consider Coda a viable competitor to Airtable.

Pros

1. Moves Quickly: Database creation time varies, depending on data complexity, but Baserow provides efficient tools for speedy setup.

2. Emphasis on Security: Baserow prioritizes data security, implementing strong measures to safeguard user data, in line with Airtable's practices.

Cons

1. Less Integrations: While Baserow integrates with popular tools like Zapier and Make, it has fewer native integrations compared to Airtable, another aspect to consider when choosing an Airtable competitor.

2. Fewer Templates: The template library is limited than Airtable's. If templates are important to you, you might be better off with another alternative to Airtable.

Pricing

Baserow provides a range of pricing plans to accommodate diverse user requirements.

• Free Plan: With unlimited databases.
• Premium Plan: $5/user/month with 10,000 rows per workspace.
• Advanced Plan: $20/user/month for 250,000 rows per workspace.

Each plan offers a unique set of features, including the choice between hosted or self-hosted deployment, unlimited databases, row limitations per workspace, and storage limits for attachments.

Notably, the Advanced Plan provides direct and priority support for users, ensuring a seamless experience.

Compared to Airtable, which offers a free tier and paid plans at $10 and $20 per user per month, Baserow's pricing is more affordable at the entry-level, something to consider when choosing a competitor to Airtable.

While Airtable's structure focuses on feature-specific scalability such as the number of records, attachments, and integrations, Baserow's structure emphasizes deployment options and database quantity.

Airtable vs. Baserow

Both Baserow and Airtable offer a user-friendly interface which makes it easy for beginners and requires little to no coding knowledge.

These users can easily link fields and customize views with simple point-and-click or drag-and-drop actions.

Baserow provides a versatile platform for creating diverse applications such as project management tools and customer databases, and enables users to tailor databases to specific needs.

The product management tool has extensive design and customization options, though Airtable offers more advanced customization features.

Support is offered through comprehensive documentation, FAQs, community forums, and direct support for advanced plan users.

Baserow matches Airtable's speed, ensuring a smooth and responsive user experience. Its visual design is modern and intuitive, similar to Airtable's visually pleasing layout.

Pros:

1. Easy-to-Use: Tableau’s interface is user-friendly, and users can grasp its functionalities without coding knowledge. Its robust capabilities reward those willing to invest time into switching from Airtable to this competitor.

2. Custom Integrations: Tableau integrates with a wide variety of data sources, ensuring seamless data flow.

Cons:

1. Steep Learning Curve: While you don't need coding knowledge, there is a slightly steeper learning curve than Airtable.

2. No Templates: Tableau doesn’t offer an extensive template gallery like Airtable, but its platform also enables users to save and reuse their visualizations as templates.

Pricing

Tableau's pricing is tailored to various user needs, featuring tiered options for its cloud-hosted service:

• Creator plan: $70 per user per month.
• Explorer plan: $42 per user per month.
• Viewer plan: $15 per user per month.

All plans are billed annually and require at least one Creator license.

When compared to Airtable's pricing plans—free, "Plus" at $10 per user per month, and "Pro" at $20 per user per month—Tableau's pricing leans towards the higher end, reflecting its advanced data visualization and analytics capabilities.

While Airtable offers feature-specific scalability like record limits, attachments, and integrations, Tableau provides different features based on user roles and licensing.

Airtable vs. Tableau

When deciding whether or not Tableau is a competitor to Airtable that you might be interested in, you will need to consider your needs and budget constraints as well as the level of data analysis and visualization you desire.

When creating visualizations in Tableau, you will find great versatility, as you will be able to create a wide array of visualizations, such as heat maps, scatter plots, and bar charts.

A viable competitor to Airtable in this regard, Tableau provides more advanced data analysis and visualization options.

You might want to consider this when deciding if Tableau is a viable Airtable competitor to you.

Tableau’s support is primarily offered through a comprehensive knowledge base, community forums, and direct assistance for premium users.

When compared to Airtable, Tableau’s forum and documentation are very in-depth.

Both platform’s speed and performance are commendable, offering quick rendering of visualizations.

Airtable and Tableau’s visual design focuses on functionality, offering an interface that efficiently translates data into engaging visual stories.

Pros

1. Customer Support: Grist shines in its support offerings. It provides comprehensive documentation and community forums where users can find answers and solutions.

2. High Performance: Grist delivers excellent speed and performance, ensuring efficient data management.

Cons

1. No Templates: Grist does not offer a template gallery like Airtable, which might impede some users from considering it an appealing alternative to Airtable. However, its spreadsheet-like structure facilitates easy setup of databases.

2. Less Advanced: Compared to Airtable, Grist offers less features for view customization.

Pricing

When it comes to pricing, Grist offers a range of plans to cater to different user requirements.

• Free plan: Cloud-hosted with a variety of features.
• Pro plan: $8/usermonth, which unlocks more power and peace of mind for teams with increased record limits and extended automatic backups.

Both Grist’s and Airtable's paid plans offer scalability in terms of the number of records, attachments, and integrations.

Airtable vs. Grist

Competing with Airtable, building a database in Grist can take varying amounts of time depending on the complexity of the data and the extent of customization.



It offers great versatility, with the capacity to create a diverse range of applications like project management tools, customer databases, and inventory trackers.

Grist's flexibility lies in its spreadsheet-like design, allowing users to customize their databases extensively, much akin to the adaptability found in Airtable's design. It prioritizes data security, employing robust measures to protect user data.

In terms of integrations, Grist and Airtable are very similar, being compatible with popular tools and facilitating seamless connectivity and data exchange.

Paid users have access to direct support from the Grist team. In comparison, Airtable also provides thorough documentation and community forums for its users.

However, Airtable has a distinct advantage in terms of the volume of content and user-generated resources available on the internet. Depending on how you prefer to access support, you might or might not consider Grist an alternative to Airtable you’d like to try.

Its visual design is clean and user-friendly, providing a smooth and enjoyable user experience. While it may lack advanced visualization features, Grist's robust data structuring capabilities make it a compelling competitor to Airtable.

Pros

1. Easy Adoption: Hive's user-friendly interface guarantees a smooth and intuitive user experience without the need for coding knowledge.

2. All-in-One Tool: Hive offers considerable versatility, supporting a myriad of applications, including project management, CRM, and task tracking.

Cons

1. Limited Functionality: Compared to Airtable, Hive's advanced data manipulation capabilities may be more limited.

Pricing

Hive provides pricing options that cater to various user needs.

• Free Plan: Basic usage, ensuring accessibility to all users.
• Paid Plan: $12/user/month, unlocking advanced features and scalability for businesses.

Comparatively, Airtable offers a similar free tier and paid plans starting at $10 per user per month.

With similar scalability of features, Airtable is cheaper for small teams or projects.

Airtable vs. Hive

With its extensive toolset for project management and data collaboration, Hive emerges as a compelling Airtable competitor for teams in search of a comprehensive platform.

While Hive is more project-oriented, Airtable offers a wider range of use cases and versatility, making it suitable for diverse applications beyond project management.

In terms of flexibility, Hive allows users to customize their workspace views, workflows, and project layouts. Hive also prioritizes data security, implementing stringent protocols to protect user data, just as Airtable does.

Competing with Airtable, Hive also presents robust integration capabilities with a wide range of popular tools, promoting seamless data exchange and collaboration.

In terms of support, Airtable matches up to Hive with its extensive documentation, community forums, and dedicated support for premium users. However, Airtable's larger user base often translates into a broader range of user-generated resources and content available online, supplementing its official support channels, something to consider when choosing an alternative to Airtable.

Hive's project templates cover various scenarios, expediting project setup and allowing users to dive straight into their work. While not as extensive as Airtable's, Hive's templates add significant value for project-focused users.

Performance-wise, both tools ensure fast loading times and efficient data access.

As an alternative to Airtable’s, Hive’s visual design prioritizes simplicity and functionality, facilitating easy navigation and an enjoyable user experience.

Pros

1. Strong Performance: ClickUp ensures responsive app delivery with quick data access, ensuring an efficient workflow.

2.  Customization: Users can easily adapt their dashboards to different projects and users.

Cons

1. Less Data Manipulation: ClickUp is not specifically marketed as a spreadsheet-like database tool, so its features for advanced manipulation are more limited.

Pricing

• Free Forever plan: Freemium model best for personal use.
• Unlimited Plan: $5/member/ month.
• Business Plan: $12/member/month with advanced features

ClickUp's pricing options ensure flexibility and scalability for users and teams of all sizes.

The project management software competes with Airtable pricing options, by providing them based on the users’ needs.

However, ClickUp might be providing a more cost-effective solution for teams seeking comprehensive project management capabilities, while Airtable caters to a wider range of use cases and offers a broader ecosystem of integrations.

Airtable vs. Clickup

ClickUp showcases versatility, allowing users to manage a wide array of projects, tasks, and operations, similar to what can be achieved with Airtable's diverse functionalities.

ClickUp provides a high degree of flexibility, allowing users to customize their workspace layouts, workflows, and data structures. However, Airtable might offer a slight edge when it comes to advanced data manipulation and database-specific functionalities, something to consider when searching for an Airtable alternative if you’re interested in these features.

ClickUp maintains a strong commitment to data security, employing stringent measures to ensure the safety and privacy of user data. It also provides an array of templates, similar to Airtable. While ClickUp's template library is primarily project-focused, it offers an efficient way to kick-start various projects and tasks.

ClickUp integrates seamlessly with a wide range of tools and applications, enhancing its functionality and promoting a streamlined workflow. Although ClickUp and Airtable offer different integrations, both present a wide range of tools for different use cases.

Its extensive support offerings include comprehensive documentation, an active community forum, and dedicated support for premium users.

Alternatively, Airtable provides thorough documentation and a community forum for support. Additionally, Airtable benefits from a larger user base and an extensive online presence, resulting in a wealth of user-generated content and resources available.

Both Airtable’s and ClickUp’s modern and user-friendly visual designs create a pleasant and immersive user experience, making CluckUp an alternative to Airtable worth considering.

Pros

1. Customization: Competing with Airtable, Stackby shines with its versatility. Users can customize databases for various applications: from project management to CRM and content calendars.

2. Flexible Pricing: As an alternative to Airtable, Stackby offers more cost-effective pricing tiers.

Cons

1. Less Integrations: Stackby's scope of integration is not as expansive as Airtable, which you may want to keep in mind when deciding if Stackby is the right Airtable alternative for you.

2. Less Advanced: Airtable's advanced customization and data manipulation gives it a competitive edge over Stackby.

Pricing

Stackby's pricing is competitive and versatile.

• Free Plan: Suits individuals and small teams.
• Personal Plan: $5/user/month offers expanded features for a single user.
• Economy Plan: $9/user/month for small teams looking to get organized.
• Business Plan: $18/user/month for growing teams.

These plans provide varying levels of storage, stack limits, and automation, making Stackby adaptable to many needs.

Airtable vs. Stackby

Stackby offers a great deal of flexibility, allowing users to tailor their databases, workflows, and layouts to their specific needs.

Its learning curve is moderate, and it requires no programming skills, making it accessible for a broad audience.

When it comes to data security, both Stackby and Airtable uphold high standards, employing stringent measures to ensure user data protection and privacy. Stackby competes with Airtable by providing similar capabilities and maintaining a secure environment for your information.

Stackby also provides a variety of pre-built templates. Although they may not be as extensive as Airtable's, they still offer a helpful kick-start for various use cases.

When it comes to support, Stackby competes with Airtable by providing extensive resources, including detailed documentation, video tutorials, and a dedicated support team, just like Airtable.

Performance-wise and serving as an alternative to Airtable, Stackby ensures responsive and fast applications, with efficient data access for a smooth workflow.

Its visual design combines a spreadsheet-like interface with database functionalities, providing a user-friendly and engaging experience.